|
The
Teaching of Chronology
By
Dorothea Beale, Principal of the Cheltenham Ladies' College
The
Parents' Review, Vol. II, 1891/2 no.2, pp 81-90
So
teach me to number my days, that I may apply my heart unto wisdom.
How
far this little candle sheds its beams.
It
is a much disputed matter how we shall begin to teach history. I think
the practical teacher will say there is nothing like the stories of
antiquity--of the world's childhood--for the early education of the
childhood of to-day. The delightful tales, e.g., of the Odyssey, as
related by Hawthorne in his "Tanglewood Tales, " or the stories of
Arthur and Charlemagne, related with all the little touches which the
true artist--one who loves the little ones--knows how to introduce,
will form the best groundwork for history to the child; these awaken
the imagination and save him from ever becoming a Casaubon, a
Dry-as-dust.
But,
on the other hand, there is much to be said for the view recently
enunciated by the Emperor William, that children should begin with
their own times and read history backwards. We want to give reality to
history by showing that it is not something remote, to be found in
books only; we want to show that the life of each child forms part of
history; then we may lead him on to see that the whole world is
different for each man that has lived, better for each noble life, and
to feel quite early that God has sent him into the world with some work
ready for him, and that his business is to do that work. Not that I
would put this into so many words, but endeavour, but bringing the
child's life into immediate relations with the history of his own time,
to help him to realise this as the reflective powers develop. We must
ever be careful not to stimulate prematurely the moral and religious
feelings. "He shall grow up as a tender plant"--this is the ideal for
the perfect child, and Froebel's teaching was a sermon on that text.
But the true educator will, in planting the first seeds of thought on
any subject, bear in mind the later developments, without actually
presenting these to the mind of the child.
The
object of an Educational Union to which both parents and teachers
belong is, as I understand it, to help us to see better how school and
home can work in union and supplement one another. I propose,
therefore, to explain a system, long used in our college, but which is
even more suitable for home teaching than for the school--at least in
its initial stages.
The
Methode Mnemonique Polonaise is much valued in France. It was
introduced to my notice more than thirty years ago, and used by first
at Queen's College, London. It can be adapted to various purposes, but
I shall dwell now on its applications as a record of time, and show the
different ways in which it can be used by little children, though it is
equally well adapted for Tom Brown at Oxford (who seems to have used
it) and for the mature student of history. It may be made for little
ones into a system of object lessons, of hieroglyphics, if you will,
which appeal to the childish imagination, and help him to realise
something of the proportion of things, and, whilst looking at the
world, as each of us must, from our own "pin-point," yet see life in
relation to the lives of others.
The
practice of representing to the eye by means of diargams [sic] the
facts of science, physical and social, is becoming more common: we have
jagged lines indicating fluctuations in the winds or in the stocks: in
an American record which has been sent to me, there are coloured
squares representing the thousands of children who are regular in their
attendance at school, black squares standing for the defaulting
thousands. By such means we can see at a glance what the mind finds it
difficult otherwise to realise. Now the system to which I refer is of a
similar kind, but adapted to time. Since 100 years is about the limit
of man's life, and we generally speak of centuries in history, we take
for biography, or for history, a square divided into 100 squares, thus,
and it is read as a page of ten lines:--
Now
this may represent the life of a man or that of a century. To a little
child it should stand at first for the former, as we must proceed from
the known to the unknown, for his own life. The first square stands for
the time before he is a year old--i.e. The year "nought" of his life;
the second square for the time when he is one year old, and so we mark
the squares accordingly. The first line gives the first decade of life,
in the second line we have all the tens, in the third all the twenties,
and so on; whilst, looking vertically downwards, we have in the first
row all the numbers ending with zero; in the second those ending with
one, and so on. A child very quickly learns to read on a black chart
the number corresponding to any square in the century of squares; a
line somewhat thicker is given down the centre to help the eye, and it
is easy to remember that the fifty comes just beyond the central
horizontal line and five beyond the central vertical line.
Now
as soon as the child is able to understand it I would rule such a
square and put it into a little glazed frame with a removable back, say
a transparent slate; it would be well to have the frame oblong, so that
there may be room along the left side to make a few entries of
anniversary days. Then I would put in the events of the child's life.
Let me give specimens. Mary is fourteen. On the top of the frame stands
"Mary Jones, December 20, 1876." In the first square of Mary's chart is
a little yellow star: a new life has come to light, and faint yellow
paint covers the first fourteen squares, not yet the fifteenth, which
the one passing away. In the fourth square is another star: Harold
makes his appearance, and his birthday is in the margin. In the next
square there is a black circle, like a star or sun eclipsed--that is
grandpa's death. The next year school life begins for Mary in the
Kindergarten--shall we have a little plant just peeping above the
ground? A ship will tell of the year that papa and mamma sailed for
India and left their children; another, in the opposite direction, will
tell of their return some years later.
In
the next line Mary enters on her eleventh year; she is ten years old,
and has done with the units. She is to go now to school; but before she
goes, on the first morning, her chart is taken from its frame, perhaps
a simple doorway drawn, or something more picturesque, and the day
entered in the margin, and a few words of prayer offered that she may
there learn things which make her truly wise; and each year as the
birthday comes round the blanks are diminished, new events are added,
over one more square the yellow light extends.
I
am sure parents will devise some very beautiful horoscopes which may
take the place the those wonderful framed samplers of old times, which
it will be a joy for their children to look at in later life, as they
remember the birthday addition each year, the sorrows and the joys
there noted down, the prayers of the family for each new-comer, and the
marriage days.
When
the child has learnt the use of such a chart, he may be led on to fit
these private records into the world's history. Now we can begin to
speak of centuries. It will be easy for children to think of the
century as a man who dies a hundred years old--who dies as the last
minute of the year 99 expires. Then the Queen's life could be put into
the century, and its relation shown to the child's own life. All would
remember the Jubilee. "It was when Mary was ten years old; she saw the
illuminations." She can count back on the chart fifty years to '37, and
there she puts a crown. Then the story might be
told
of the Queen's early life, and all those familiar incidents which give
to historical people a personal life (the principal ones are marked in
the proper squares): for instance, the Queen's marriage; the birth and
marriage of the Empress Victoria; the birth and marriage of the Prince
of Wales; the death of Prince Albert, &c.
Later,
what are called historical events, as opposed to biographical, are more
prominent--e.g. The Russian War, the Indian Mutiny, the first Great
Exhibition, and striking contemporary events. The history of the
Queen's life involves that of her predecessor, her sailor uncle
William, and so on, back to the beginning to George, her grandfather;
the Battle of Waterloo brings in Napoleon, the Revolution, &c.
I
venture to think that a child who begins history thus--not at the
Creation, nor even at the Christian era, but at his own
"nativity"---will get to understand it better than if he tried to
survey the world from any other "pin-point" in time.
But
when one century has been thus treated, I would place before the child
a map, in which the eighteen Christian centuries are brought together
thus on a small scale with some characteristic to give it individuality:
Later,
we should make such a chart on a larger scale, and with room for ruling
and marking important events. We use charts coloured for various
periods of English History--e.g., the Roman occupation, the various
Royal Houses. * The four periods of five centuries each, form good
divisions for Modern History. In the first line we have, roughly, from
Augustus to the fall of Rome, and in England the period of Roman
occupation. In the second line we have the period of barbarian
settlements--tribes are changing into nations. In the third line we
have, speaking roughly, the Mediaeval period. In the fourth, Modern
History.
In
the first instance, the greatest prominence should be given to English
History, events in contemporaneous history being very gradually
introduced. One great good of this plan of laying out a map of history
from the parents' point of view, is that the well-read and cultured
mother can do excellent work--can do exactly what the school wants
done,---without having that systematic knowledge of history which only
the school-teacher can be expected to possess. Thus the mother or
sister, with the chart before her, may choose the period or episode
most familar [sic] to her; the frame-work will prevent the events,
which are given out of their historical order, from being shaken
together into a chaos. It requires considerable thinking power to
understand time-relations in history. "Lord Wolseley," said a girl to
whom his lordship was kindly showing things he had brought from
Egypt--"Lord Wolseley, did you know that Pharoah?" "Please, ma'am,"
said a young servant to her mistress, "did you know Queen Elizabeth?"
If from the first things are fitted into their places, there will be
preparation for the systematic teaching of later school and college
life.
Suppose
the mother had been reading Stanley's "Eastern Church." She might give
that dramatic description of the Council of Nicaea, or scenes from the
catastrophe of the fifth century, which is especially well described in
Shepherd's "Fall of Rome," and made vivid in the narrative of
Kingsley's "Hypatia." In connection with the second line would come the
Arthurian, Carlovingian, and Alfred legends, the life of Mahomet, the
formation of the future European States, ready to become "Christendom,"
and able to unite in common warfare against the common foe. Sir James
Stephen's essay on Hildebrand will give life to the eleventh century;
the final settlement of the Northmen in England, as related in the
Bayeux tapestry, will interest old and young. Then come stories of the
Crusaders. In the thirteenth century we have the history of St. Louis
so beautifully related by the Sieur de Joinville. Michelet's "History
of France" gives most interesting accounts of the Albigensian Crusade
under De Montfort. Then comes the foundation of the orders of the
Friars, the Salvation Army of that date, and the suppression of the
Templars. Later, Shakespeare's plays, Scott's novels, all will fit in.
White's "Eighteen Christian Centuries" is invaluable for such lessons,
and, above all, it creates an appetite for more. Gibbon's ponderous
style is quite unsuitable for the young, to say nothing of other
objections, but there is a useful abridgment. Milman's "Latin
Christianity" is most useful. Such books as Miss Yonge's "Cameos," and
"Landmarks," and many historical tales, will come in useful.
Now
for apparatus. For elder children I have had a little book prepared
which contains much on which I cannot touch in an article. But to
little children I give blank sheets, which they can paint and colour,
and for some time we let them mark in important events of English
history alone; at first making very distinct marks, and colouring the
chart for different periods. Into this framework we can subsequently
introduce contemporary events abroad. The child would learn first only
English kinds, as she would the shape of a constellation.
In
France movable beads are used to mark the different events; this I have
found an excellent plan for little children at home. Or children can
mark in events with the pencil. Then a game can be made by a number of
children trying who can set up most quickly the dates agreed on in the
model chart--white, black, and other coloured counters representing
different sovereigns, &c.; or small chessmen may stand for kings,
chess castles for sieges, chess bishops for churchmen, knights for war,
pawns for famous men. Older pupils like to make a pictorial chart for
themselves. I have one giving the reign of Queen Mary: 1553, her
accession, and a picture of the Tower, to which Northumberland and
others were sent; 1554, a block telling of executions consequent on
Wyatt's rebellion, and a dove with an olive branch to tell of Philip's
intercession for Elizabeth; 1555, there is a picture of a martyr at the
stake: and a hand in flames for Cranmer; 1557, a scroll stands for the
first covenant in Scotland, and a sword for the war with France; 1558,
a heart with the word Calais reminds us of Mary's words, and a crown
marks the accession of Elizabeth.
For
grown-up students, who are reading a short period, we have exercise
books ruled on a larger scale, in ten lines and they simply write in
words anything they wish to remember, and thus acquire a knowledge of
dates without learning them.
I
give as an appendix a specimen chart of the sixteenth century. The
crown may mark the accession of Henry VIII, Edward VI., Mary,
Elizabeth; here we have portraits. There is Henry's divorce in 1553,
after which follow in quick succession, in about eleven years, five
marriages, two executions of queens, and those of Fisher, More,
Cromwell, and others. In Elizabeth's reign the Armada, the battle of
Zutphen, and Sir Philip Sydney's death; and in the first line an
important literary decade--the first publication of the three books of
"The Faerie Queene;" Shakespeare's first poems and first plays; Bacon's
Essays, and Hooker's Ecclesiastical Polity. The Fleur de Lys marks the
French Kings, Francis I., Henry II., the husband of Catherine de
Medicis, and her three sons. Lastly, the accession of Henry IV.
The
Maltese cross marks the accession of the holy Roman Emperor, Charles
V., and his successors. The crescent, the advance of Mahommedan power
in Europe under Soleyman the Magnificent, and in India under Baber. The
daggers point to the assassination of Guise, Massacre of St.
Bartholomew, and the assassination of William of Orange, followed soon
after by that of Henry III. In Church History the crosses mark the Diet
of Worms, the sanction of the order of Jesuits by the Pope, the Council
of Trent, and the edict of Nantes, which marked the temporary
pacification in France.
How
valuable some such tabulated knowledge is as a basis of historical
teaching, all who have tried the system are agreed. The chief
advantages of this system over every other memoria technica are--
1.
That it forms a framework, which from the first saves events from
getting shaken into disorder in the memory: and the frame can be made
large or small, filled but scantily at first, and gradually expanded.
2. It
can be adapted to any purpose--political history, church history,
literary history the progress of scientific discovery.
3. It
shows at a glance the contemporary history of different countries, yet
4. It
is compact in form, so that it can be easily remembered.
5.
Even if the precise date of any event is not retained yet the general
position becomes as familiar to the mind as the relative positions of
places in a map of Europe.
I
am sure those who have once learnt in their youth to use the chart will
never discard it and will, as they go on to think about the philosophy
of history, find that the way in which events present themselves to the
mind's eye is most helpful and suggestive. The day of "Mangnall's
Questions," "Brewer's Guide," and "Pinnock's Catechisms" is gone by in
the work of education, and we have learned to feel that the chief work
of the educator is not to give facts, but to order them so that they
can fit into the "forms of thought."
In
the beautiful myth with which more than one poet of our day has made us
familiar, we read that the forlorn Psyche in the course of her
wanderings came to the temple of Aphrodite, and there the goddess
assigned to her the task of sorting out and arranging innumerable
seeds, and to her diligence and obedience was granted at last the
vision which she had lost through her faithless impatience--the vision
of the God of Love. Is this, perhaps, one of the teachings unfolded in
the myth--the supreme joy is to know love but the vision of God is to
be attained only by the patient discipline, by the ordered knowledge
through which that which seems chaos is transformed into a Kosmos, and
we are able to think God's thoughts after Him?"
|